Somebody just asked for exactly what you sell.
You share your project. A free daily letter shows you the people already asking for it, and when you want them answered, I answer them under my own name.
10+ platforms monitored+
New posts found every day, in public forums and in the private groups no ad can reach.
Every comment written and reviewed by a human+
The machine drafts. I decide, rewrite, and post.
Leads warmed up, follow-ups sent+
You buy conversations, not clicks.
A daily report by email+
A proof link for every conversation.
4 spots left for August
Here is exactly what happens.
-
You share your project
One onboarding: what you sell, who it is not for, and where a warm person should land. That becomes your ICP, the buyer profile everything downstream is judged against, and the only work you ever do here.
-
I find the people already asking
Not keyword alerts. Keywords find mentions; they cannot tell a buyer from someone complaining about one. The automation watches 10+ platforms, including Reddit, Hacker News, forums, and the private Discord and Telegram groups I am a member of, and a proprietary model reads every thread against your ICP, scoring whether this person is genuinely an opportunity. What reaches me is a shortlist, not a feed.
-
The daily letter shows you them, free
Every morning the automation has found somebody asking, the thread lands in your inbox with the link, up to three a week, free. Answer them yourself and it never costs a cent, and the letter doubles as the cheapest way to check my judgement before any of it is paid.
-
A human writes every comment
From here down is the paid part. The machine drafts. I throw most threads away, rewrite what survives, and post it under my own name. Nothing goes up unread.
-
You buy conversations
I warm each lead up and follow up until someone answers back, and then the conversation is yours. A daily email lists every comment with a proof link, so you never take my word for it.
The live experiment.
This offer is its own first client. Every comment posted to sell this page goes into a public log, with the platform, the thread and the link, next to the day's visitors, so you can watch the method work, or fail, before your dollar touches it.
Not my words.
Both of these are for Messaging Quest, the marketing automation I built and run this service on.
Three ways in.
The same machine runs under all three. What changes is how much of my time sits on top of it: read the threads yourself, have me answer them, or hand the whole month over.
The daily letter
Free
three threads a week
One line about what you sell. Every morning the automation finds somebody asking for it, the thread lands in your inbox with the link, and the answering is yours. A morning with nothing real says so; it never pads.
Get the letter →No card and no form. One email starts it, one word stops it. Telegram works too: @theicreator.
The service
from $100/week
$0.95 falling to $0.60 per conversation
I answer them for you, under my own name, and follow up until somebody answers back. Only threads that got a reply count. Set the ceiling, pay for the week ahead, cancel any week.
Set your target →3-day 100% money-back guarantee.
The full package
$990
one 30-day run, no meter
Everything, handled. We define your ICP together on a call, I answer every qualified thread the month turns up and carry the follow-ups, and the daily report logs each comment with its proof link. One price, whatever the volume. Two of these a month, never in competing niches.
Book the call →Same three days, same 100% back.
Set your target. Start.
Drag to what a week is worth to you, then start. You pay for the week ahead, the amount never changes on its own, and you can cancel any week.
280+conversations
What counts as a conversation. A real thread where somebody is actively asking for what you sell, answered under my own name. Only threads that got a reply are counted, so a comment nobody engaged with never reaches the figure above. What nobody can promise is how many of those replies become customers; that depends on your product more than on me. Bigger weeks stretch further, because the same groundwork covers more threads: at $1,000 a week a conversation costs about 37% less than it does at $100.
Straight answers.
When do I actually pay, and how do I stop?+
You pay for the week ahead, at the target you picked, and again at the start of each week you stay. There are no invoices to remember and nothing billed after the fact. Cancel any week from the link in your receipt. It takes one click and no conversation with me. And if the first three days don't convince you, say so and you get 100% back, no questions. The full package is the one exception: a single payment for the 30-day run, with the same three days to take it all back.
Where is the catch in the free letter?+
There is no catch, but there is a bet, and you should see it. The letter costs me almost nothing, because the automation already reads these platforms for the paying projects. Three threads a week is enough to prove people are asking for what you sell, and my bet is that once you have answered a few yourself, you will know exactly what you are buying when you hand the answering to me. If you never do, keep the letter. Free means free.
What does the full package add over the service?+
Mostly, it removes the meter. On the service you set a weekly ceiling and the work is sized to it. The package is one price for a 30-day run: we define your ICP together on a call instead of a form, every qualified thread the month turns up gets answered, and the follow-ups are carried until each conversation is yours, whatever the volume turns out to be. It exists for people who would rather make one decision than ten. I take two a month, never in competing niches.
Whose accounts do you post from?+
Mine. You never hand over a login and I never ask for one. If a moderator has a problem with a post, it is my account and my problem, and that is the single biggest difference between hiring me and installing a tool that posts as you.
Is an AI writing the posts?+
AI is not the future, Human + AI is. The automation does the reading at a scale no person could: it judges every thread against your ICP rather than matching keywords, then drafts. I decide which of those deserve an answer at all, rewrite whatever sounds like a machine, and press the button myself. Nothing posts itself.
Do I get to approve the messages first?+
No, and that is deliberate. How a thread gets answered is a tactical call made in the moment: the register, the timing, whether to name your product at all. Running each one past you would slow it past the point where the answer is still useful. You are hiring the judgement. The check on it is the three-day guarantee: you see the real posts going up, and if the way I write is not how you want your product spoken about, you stop and get everything back.
Why is the price per conversation so low?+
Because the expensive parts are automated and the part that stays human is the judgement. Before anyone is answered, the automation runs a background check on them, covering who they are, what they have already said, and whether your product genuinely fits, so the hours nobody wants to pay for are not hours at all. Then Quest One, our own model, drafts the opener. It is trained specifically on gift-openers: posts that give something away before they ask for anything, so every comment is worth reading even by someone who never clicks through to you. I read every draft, rewrite what needs it, and post it myself. Volume without that judgement would be spam; the judgement without the machine would cost several times this.
Can I be surprised by a charge?+
No. You are charged exactly the figure you picked, at the start of each week, until you cancel. It never moves on its own, and nothing is ever billed after the fact for work already done.
Isn't this just spam with extra steps?+
It would be, if the volume were high and the comments were empty. Most threads are thrown away, the reply has to be worth reading even for someone who never clicks through, and when a post names your product it says plainly that I work with you. An undisclosed plug is what gets accounts removed, and it is my account.
How many projects do you take?+
A few at a time, and never two that would compete for the same threads, because every answer goes up under one name, and that name has to stay welcome in the rooms it posts in. If your niche is already taken when you start, I will tell you straight away and refund you in full.
Who you are actually hiring.
I am Serhii, an AI engineer with more than ten years of building software. I closed my role as a CTO in 2026, and since then I have released three projects solo, start to finish.
Shipping them taught me distribution the expensive way. I ran ads, sent cold emails, wrote text posts, recorded video. Some of it worked, sometimes. None of it was repeatable. Virality is a lottery you cannot schedule, and paid traffic costs the same whether or not the person on the other end ever wanted the thing.
One channel behaved differently every time: answering the people who were already online asking for what I had built. It was the cheapest way to reach them, the least random, and the one that converted best, because the intent was there before I arrived.
So I built the automation that finds those people, and this page is sold with it. The public log is this service used on itself, which is the only claim here you can check without paying for anything.
Talk to me first.
No form and no sequence. Take thirty minutes in my calendar, or write to me directly, whichever you would rather do.
Thirty minutes, free, no deck. Bring a link to what you sell and I will tell you on the call whether people are asking for it.
- serhiilahutin@gmail.com · email
- @theicreator · Telegram
Somebody is asking right now.
By tomorrow the thread has scrolled away, answered by someone else. The letter would have shown it to you, free. Or set a target and start this week, cancel any week, and if the first three days don't convince you, take it all back.